The standard requires a quality manual to be establishedand maintained that includes the scope of the qualitymanagement system, the documented procedures or refer-ence to them and a description of the sequence andinteraction of processes included in the quality manage-ment system.
ISO 9000 defines a quality manual as a documentspecifying the quality management system of an organi-zation. It is therefore not intended that themanual be a response to the requirements ofISO 9001. As the top-level document describingthe management system it is a system descriptiondescribing how the organization is managed.Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9000 :2008, were nomore than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard.Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff orauditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gainno more confidence from customers than would be obtained from theirregistration certificate.
This requirement responds to the System Approach Principle.A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showinghow all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver thebusiness outputs. It has several uses as :a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectivesof the organizationa means of showing how the system has been designeda means of showing linkages between processesa means of showing who does whatan aid to training new peoplea tool in the analysis of potential improvementsa means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes toachieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing suchinformation. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult tosee the linkages.The requirement provides the framework for the manual. Its content maytherefore include the following:1 Introduction(a) Purpose (of the manual)(b) Scope (of the manual)(c) Applicability (of the manual)(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)2 Business overview(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its productsand services(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators,shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its externalenvironment(d) Vision, values(e) Mission3 Organization(a) Function descriptions(b) Organization chart(c) Locations with scope of activity4 Business processes(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they areinterconnected(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement(c) Business planning process description(d) Resource management process description(e) Marketing process description(f) Product/service generation processes description(g) Sales process description(h) Order fulfilment process description5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)7 Requirement deployment matrices(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety,CAA etc.)8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)
Monday, August 31, 2009
Continual improvement in the quality management In ISO 9001
Continual improvement in the quality management system and its processes In ISO 9001
The standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results andcontinual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
This requirement responds to the Continual Improvement principle. If the management system is enabling the organization to accomplish its objectives when that is its purpose, why improve? The need for improvement arises out of a need to become more effective at what you do, more efficient in the utilization of resources so that the organization becomes best in its class. The purpose of measuring process performance is to establish whether or not the objectives are being achieved and if not to take action on the difference. If the performance targets are being achieved, opportunities may well exist to raise standards and increase efficiency and effectiveness.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higherIncrease efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning in Chapter 5. There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement (Juran, J. M., 1995)12 .1 Determine current performance2 Establish the need for change3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives4 Organize diagnostic resources5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of currentperformance6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvementobjectives7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changeswill be implemented8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change9 Implement the change10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one.
The standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results andcontinual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
This requirement responds to the Continual Improvement principle. If the management system is enabling the organization to accomplish its objectives when that is its purpose, why improve? The need for improvement arises out of a need to become more effective at what you do, more efficient in the utilization of resources so that the organization becomes best in its class. The purpose of measuring process performance is to establish whether or not the objectives are being achieved and if not to take action on the difference. If the performance targets are being achieved, opportunities may well exist to raise standards and increase efficiency and effectiveness.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higherIncrease efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning in Chapter 5. There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement (Juran, J. M., 1995)12 .1 Determine current performance2 Establish the need for change3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives4 Organize diagnostic resources5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of currentperformance6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvementobjectives7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changeswill be implemented8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change9 Implement the change10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one.
Migration to ISO 9001:2008
Migration To ISO 9001:2008The International Accreditation Forum (IAF) and the International Organization forStandardization (ISO) have agreed on an implementation plan to ensure a smooth transition ofaccredited certification to ISO 9001:2008, the latest version of the world’s most widely usedstandard for quality management systems (QMS). The details of the plan are given in the jointcommuniqué by the two organizations which appears below.Like all of ISO’s more than 17 000 standards, ISO 9001 is periodically reviewed to ensure that itis maintained at the state of the art and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise thedocument.ISO 9001:2008, which is due to be published before the end of the year, will replace the year2000 version of the standard which is implemented by both business and public sectororganizations in 170 countries. Although certification is not a requirement of the standard, theQMS of about one million organizations have been audited and certified by independentcertification bodies (also known in some countries as registration bodies) to ISO 9001:2000.ISO 9001 certification is frequently used in both private and public sectors to increaseconfidence in the products and services provided by certified organizations, between partnersin business-to-business relations, in the selection of suppliers in supply chains and in the rightto tender for procurement contracts.ISO is the developer and publisher of ISO 9001, but does not itself carry out auditing andcertification. These services are performed independently of ISO by certification bodies. ISOdoes not control such bodies, but does develop voluntary International Standards toencourage good practice in their activities on a worldwide basis. For example, ISO/IEC17021:2006 specifies the requirements for bodies providing auditing and certification ofmanagement systems.Certification bodies that wish to provide further confidence in their services may apply to be“accredited” as competent by an IAF recognized national accreditation body. ISO/IEC17011:2004 specifies the requirements for carrying out such accreditation. IAF is aninternational association whose membership includes the national accreditation bodies of 49economies.ISO technical committee ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, which isresponsible for the ISO 9000 family of standards, is preparing a number of support documentsexplaining what the differences are between ISO 9001:2008 and the year 2000 version, whyand what they mean for users. Once approved, these documents will be posted on the ISOWeb site – probably in October 2008.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and the IAF (International AccreditationForum) have agreed an implementation plan to ensure a smooth migration of accreditedcertification to ISO 9001:2008, after consultation with international groupings representingquality system or auditor certification bodies, and industry users of ISO 9001 certificationservices.ISO 9001:2008 does not contain any new requirementsThey have recognized that ISO 9001:2008 introduces no new requirements. ISO 9001:2008only introduces clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eightyears of experience of implementing the standard world wide with about one millioncertificates issued in 170 countries to date. It also introduces changes intended to improveconsistency with ISO14001:2004The agreed implementation plan in relation to accredited certification is therefore thefollowing:Accredited certification to the ISO 9001:2008 shall not be granted until the publication of ISO9001:2008 as an International Standard.Certification of conformity to ISO 9001:2008 and/or national equivalents shall only be issuedafter official publication of ISO 9001:2008 (which should take place before the end of 2008)and after a routine surveillance or recertification audit against ISO 9001:2008.Validity of certifications to ISO 9001:2000One year after publication of ISO 9001:2008 all accredited certifications issued (newcertifications or recertifications) shall be to ISO 9001:2008.Twenty four months after publication by ISO of ISO 9001:2008, any existing certification issuedto ISO 9001:2000 shall not be valid.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and the IAF (International AccreditationForum) have agreed an implementation plan to ensure a smooth migration of accreditedcertification to ISO 9001:2008, after consultation with international groupings representingquality system or auditor certification bodies, and industry users of ISO 9001 certificationservices.ISO 9001:2008 does not contain any new requirementsThey have recognized that ISO 9001:2008 introduces no new requirements. ISO 9001:2008only introduces clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eightyears of experience of implementing the standard world wide with about one millioncertificates issued in 170 countries to date. It also introduces changes intended to improveconsistency with ISO14001:2004The agreed implementation plan in relation to accredited certification is therefore thefollowing:Accredited certification to the ISO 9001:2008 shall not be granted until the publication of ISO9001:2008 as an International Standard.Certification of conformity to ISO 9001:2008 and/or national equivalents shall only be issuedafter official publication of ISO 9001:2008 (which should take place before the end of 2008)and after a routine surveillance or recertification audit against ISO 9001:2008.Validity of certifications to ISO 9001:2000One year after publication of ISO 9001:2008 all accredited certifications issued (newcertifications or recertifications) shall be to ISO 9001:2008.Twenty four months after publication by ISO of ISO 9001:2008, any existing certification issuedto ISO 9001:2000 shall not be valid.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Scope of the ISO 9001 quality management system
The standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion.
The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9000 :2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because itoperated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the management system.
This requirement responds to the System Approach Principle.It is sensible to describe the scope of the management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor.
Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical tojustify inclusions.
The scope of the management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’. It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable. For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9000 :2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because itoperated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the management system.
This requirement responds to the System Approach Principle.It is sensible to describe the scope of the management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor.
Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical tojustify inclusions.
The scope of the management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’. It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable. For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
Managing processes In ISO 9001 Standard
The standard requires the organization to manage the identified processes in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001. The first stage in managing a process is to establish what it is you are trying to achieve, what requirements you need to satisfy, what goals you are aiming at; then establish how you will measure your achievements. The next stage is to define the process you will employ to deliver the results. Managing the process then involves managing all the inherentcharacteristics of the process in such a manner that the requirements of customers and interested parties are fulfilled by the process outcomes. This means:Managing the process inputsManaging the workManaging the physical resourcesManaging the financial resourcesManaging the human resourcesManaging the constraintsManaging the outputs
Process management is therefore much more than managing activities and therefore when describing processes, one needs more than a flow chart of activities. The chart is a diagrammatical representation of a process but only one aspect. One can also add numerical data to the charts to indicate resources, cycle times, delays, costs etc. but the intangible factors of the human environment cannot be reduced to numerical data to add to the charts.
The notes to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001 need some explanation. It is stated that the processes needed for the management system include management activities, provision of resources, product realization and measurement. This note could cause confusion because it suggests that these are the processes that are needed for the management system. It would be unwise to use this as the model and far better to identify the processes from observing how the business operates. The term provision of resources should be Resource Management, which is thecollection of processes covering financial, human and physical resources.
Product realization is also a collection of processes such as design, production, service delivery, etc. Measurement is not a single process but a sub-process within each process. Grouping all the measurement processes together serves no useful purpose except it matches the standard – a purpose of little value in managing the organization.
The second note refers to outsourcing processes although it is difficult to imagine that management activities, product realization or measurement would be outsourced in its entirety. It is likely that market research; design, product verification, equipment calibration and other specialized services may be outsourced. While outsourcing comes under purchasing, it is correct to point out that the organization should control any outsourced processes. The supplier of the process is usually referred to as a subcontractor because they provide services to the organization’s requirements not their own. Control of subcontractors is covered by clause 7.4 but in meeting clause 7.4.3, you need to treat suppliers and subcontractors differently.
Process management is therefore much more than managing activities and therefore when describing processes, one needs more than a flow chart of activities. The chart is a diagrammatical representation of a process but only one aspect. One can also add numerical data to the charts to indicate resources, cycle times, delays, costs etc. but the intangible factors of the human environment cannot be reduced to numerical data to add to the charts.
The notes to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001 need some explanation. It is stated that the processes needed for the management system include management activities, provision of resources, product realization and measurement. This note could cause confusion because it suggests that these are the processes that are needed for the management system. It would be unwise to use this as the model and far better to identify the processes from observing how the business operates. The term provision of resources should be Resource Management, which is thecollection of processes covering financial, human and physical resources.
Product realization is also a collection of processes such as design, production, service delivery, etc. Measurement is not a single process but a sub-process within each process. Grouping all the measurement processes together serves no useful purpose except it matches the standard – a purpose of little value in managing the organization.
The second note refers to outsourcing processes although it is difficult to imagine that management activities, product realization or measurement would be outsourced in its entirety. It is likely that market research; design, product verification, equipment calibration and other specialized services may be outsourced. While outsourcing comes under purchasing, it is correct to point out that the organization should control any outsourced processes. The supplier of the process is usually referred to as a subcontractor because they provide services to the organization’s requirements not their own. Control of subcontractors is covered by clause 7.4 but in meeting clause 7.4.3, you need to treat suppliers and subcontractors differently.
ISO 9001 Quality Policy
On customersWe will listen to our customers, understand and balance their needs andexpectations with those of our suppliers, employees, investors and society andendeavour to give full satisfaction to all parties.On leadershipWe will establish and communicate our vision for the organization and throughour leadership exemplify core values to guide the behaviour of all to achieve ourvision.On peopleWe will involve our people in the organization’s development, utilize theirknowledge and experience, recognize their contribution and provide an environ-ment in which they are motivated to realize their full potential.On processes and systemsWe will take a process approach towards the management of work and manage ourprocesses as a single system of interconnected processes that delivers all theorganization’s objectives.On continual improvementWe will provide an environment in which every person is motivated tocontinually improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our products, processes andour management system.On decisionsWe will base our decisions on the logical and intuitive analysis of data collectedwhere possible from accurate measurements of product, process and systemcharacteristics.On supplier relationshipsWe will develop alliances with our suppliers and work with them to jointlyimprove performance.http://www.iso-consults.comhttp://www.iso9001store.comhttp://www.iso14000store.com
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System Standard
ISO 9001:2008 is the world most successful standard addressing best practice in the application of quality management systems.
The standard is based around the principles of customer satisfaction, continual improvement and the development of a process based quality management system. Although not referenced in the standard itself the ISO 9001:2008 document is underpinned by eight key quality management principles;
a customer focused organisation
leadership
the involvement of people
ensuring a process approach
a systematic approach to management
a factual approach to decision making
mutually beneficial supplier relations
continuous improvement
ISO 9001:2008 has been written to ensure that its guiding principles are equally relevant to all sectors of industry and to all types of organisation. Although containing requirements to control the key processes within an organisation, it only requires six documented procedures. The standard emphasises the need for an organisation to continually monitor their own processes and systems, with many clauses making reference to self monitoring or measurement or both. This emphasis aims for an integrated approach to business processes. Instead of operating to a business plan on one hand and a quality management system on the other, the standard aims to integrate both of these functions into one system.
What is a quality management system?ISO 9001:2008 is a standard that specifies criteria for a quality management system (QMS). A QMS incorporates those elements of an organisations management system that direct and control it with regard to quality. Such a system will need to be supported by top management who will need to be able to demonstrate management commitment.
How do you demonstrate management commitment?Management commitment is one of the cornerstones of ISO 9001:2008, requiring top management to develop and improve the QMS throughout the organisation. This commitment can be demonstrated by a number of methods including creating a quality policy, conducting management reviews and establishing quality objectives.
What is a quality policy?ISO 9001:2008 specifies that an organisation must have a quality policy that documents the organisations overall intentions and direction related to quality as formally expressed by top management. Such a policy will include a commitment to comply with ISO 9001:2008, to continuously improve the QMS and to set and monitor measurable quality objectives.
What are quality objectives?The quality objectives are those targets sought or aimed for by the organisation that are related to quality. These quality objectives must be SMART (suitable, measurable, achievable, reviewed and timely). Examples of quality objectives might be; to reduce machine down time by 20% or to reduce rework costs by ?00 p/m. Whatever quality objectives are chosen they must be meaningful and adequately resourced by the organisation.
What is a management review?A management review is a key element of how the top management of an organisation can assess its performance in terms of the objectives it sets itself, the requirements set by the standard and how its systems are operating. Normally, a management review is a regular meeting of the top management team and uses the information that the organisation? systems have derived. It is a useful forum to review and revise quality objectives.
What are internal audits and why do I need to carry them out?Internal audit is one of the key monitoring processes required by the standard and functions as a check on the organisation? systems. It is the opportunity for an organisation to determine compliance to the systems it has established and maintained to meet the needs of its customers and identify opportunities for improvement. Internal audit can be seen as a ealth check?for an organisation.
The ore?of ISO 9001:2008, Product realisationClause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 contains the core processes that most organisations carry out. Any clause or sub-clause in section 7 can be excluded from an organisations quality management system if it can be justifiably excluded. Examples of common exclusions are clause 7.3 design and development, clause 7.5.3 traceability and clause 7.6 the control of monitoring and measuring devices. Clauses can only be excluded if their exclusion does not affect the company? ability to provide a product or service that meets customer requirements.
These core processes should be managed and controlled via the quality management system, and are evaluated for effectiveness and suitability by the internal audits with feed back into the management review.
This is a clear demonstration of one of the key principles of ISO 9001:2008, continuous improvement by critical self-evaluation. The output from the self-evaluation is fed into a planning stage to determine actions needed to improve the system. Following the planning and consultation comes the action phase where the proposed changes are implemented. Then the cycle starts again by checking that the changes are effective and meaningful by self-evaluation.
Other requirements of section 7 are;Product planning to ascertain and then implement the necessary controls and resources to ensure product realisation.
Purchasing control to verify purchased product against comprehensive purchasing information and the selection and evaluation of suppliers.
Production and service provision to ensure that this activity is carried out in controlled conditions and that any processes that cannot be verified during production are validated to ensure capability. Where appropriate the product must be identified, and if required, traceable at all stages of production. Any customer property must be identified and protected from harm and all products must be stored and handled in such a way to preserve product conformity.
Any monitoring and measuring devices needed to provide evidence of product conformity must be identified and if necessary calibrated.
But what about the customer? All of the clauses in ISO 9001:2008 are in some way focused towards meeting and exceeding the customer? expectations. For example the requirement of management to determine and communicate the importance of customer requirements throughout the organisation, and the review of customer orders to ensure that they can be met. Companies are required to implement methods for effective communication with the client at all stages of the business including ascertaining customer satisfaction after the product or service has been delivered as well as resolving customer complaints.
Finally?ISO 9001:2008 is widely acclaimed as being the pre-eminent specification for quality management systems, it requires a company to look at itself and ask the question, ‘how can we improve?’ An ISO 9001:2008 management system should be an essential part of any business process, requiring continual improvement by self-evaluation with a goal of ensuring that current and future customer expectation can be met and exceeded.
If you have any queries concerning ISO 9001:2008 please visit http://www.iso-consults.com/
The standard is based around the principles of customer satisfaction, continual improvement and the development of a process based quality management system. Although not referenced in the standard itself the ISO 9001:2008 document is underpinned by eight key quality management principles;
a customer focused organisation
leadership
the involvement of people
ensuring a process approach
a systematic approach to management
a factual approach to decision making
mutually beneficial supplier relations
continuous improvement
ISO 9001:2008 has been written to ensure that its guiding principles are equally relevant to all sectors of industry and to all types of organisation. Although containing requirements to control the key processes within an organisation, it only requires six documented procedures. The standard emphasises the need for an organisation to continually monitor their own processes and systems, with many clauses making reference to self monitoring or measurement or both. This emphasis aims for an integrated approach to business processes. Instead of operating to a business plan on one hand and a quality management system on the other, the standard aims to integrate both of these functions into one system.
What is a quality management system?ISO 9001:2008 is a standard that specifies criteria for a quality management system (QMS). A QMS incorporates those elements of an organisations management system that direct and control it with regard to quality. Such a system will need to be supported by top management who will need to be able to demonstrate management commitment.
How do you demonstrate management commitment?Management commitment is one of the cornerstones of ISO 9001:2008, requiring top management to develop and improve the QMS throughout the organisation. This commitment can be demonstrated by a number of methods including creating a quality policy, conducting management reviews and establishing quality objectives.
What is a quality policy?ISO 9001:2008 specifies that an organisation must have a quality policy that documents the organisations overall intentions and direction related to quality as formally expressed by top management. Such a policy will include a commitment to comply with ISO 9001:2008, to continuously improve the QMS and to set and monitor measurable quality objectives.
What are quality objectives?The quality objectives are those targets sought or aimed for by the organisation that are related to quality. These quality objectives must be SMART (suitable, measurable, achievable, reviewed and timely). Examples of quality objectives might be; to reduce machine down time by 20% or to reduce rework costs by ?00 p/m. Whatever quality objectives are chosen they must be meaningful and adequately resourced by the organisation.
What is a management review?A management review is a key element of how the top management of an organisation can assess its performance in terms of the objectives it sets itself, the requirements set by the standard and how its systems are operating. Normally, a management review is a regular meeting of the top management team and uses the information that the organisation? systems have derived. It is a useful forum to review and revise quality objectives.
What are internal audits and why do I need to carry them out?Internal audit is one of the key monitoring processes required by the standard and functions as a check on the organisation? systems. It is the opportunity for an organisation to determine compliance to the systems it has established and maintained to meet the needs of its customers and identify opportunities for improvement. Internal audit can be seen as a ealth check?for an organisation.
The ore?of ISO 9001:2008, Product realisationClause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 contains the core processes that most organisations carry out. Any clause or sub-clause in section 7 can be excluded from an organisations quality management system if it can be justifiably excluded. Examples of common exclusions are clause 7.3 design and development, clause 7.5.3 traceability and clause 7.6 the control of monitoring and measuring devices. Clauses can only be excluded if their exclusion does not affect the company? ability to provide a product or service that meets customer requirements.
These core processes should be managed and controlled via the quality management system, and are evaluated for effectiveness and suitability by the internal audits with feed back into the management review.
This is a clear demonstration of one of the key principles of ISO 9001:2008, continuous improvement by critical self-evaluation. The output from the self-evaluation is fed into a planning stage to determine actions needed to improve the system. Following the planning and consultation comes the action phase where the proposed changes are implemented. Then the cycle starts again by checking that the changes are effective and meaningful by self-evaluation.
Other requirements of section 7 are;Product planning to ascertain and then implement the necessary controls and resources to ensure product realisation.
Purchasing control to verify purchased product against comprehensive purchasing information and the selection and evaluation of suppliers.
Production and service provision to ensure that this activity is carried out in controlled conditions and that any processes that cannot be verified during production are validated to ensure capability. Where appropriate the product must be identified, and if required, traceable at all stages of production. Any customer property must be identified and protected from harm and all products must be stored and handled in such a way to preserve product conformity.
Any monitoring and measuring devices needed to provide evidence of product conformity must be identified and if necessary calibrated.
But what about the customer? All of the clauses in ISO 9001:2008 are in some way focused towards meeting and exceeding the customer? expectations. For example the requirement of management to determine and communicate the importance of customer requirements throughout the organisation, and the review of customer orders to ensure that they can be met. Companies are required to implement methods for effective communication with the client at all stages of the business including ascertaining customer satisfaction after the product or service has been delivered as well as resolving customer complaints.
Finally?ISO 9001:2008 is widely acclaimed as being the pre-eminent specification for quality management systems, it requires a company to look at itself and ask the question, ‘how can we improve?’ An ISO 9001:2008 management system should be an essential part of any business process, requiring continual improvement by self-evaluation with a goal of ensuring that current and future customer expectation can be met and exceeded.
If you have any queries concerning ISO 9001:2008 please visit http://www.iso-consults.com/
Thursday, August 27, 2009
QUALITY MANAGEMENT WITH ISO 9000
The methods and tools of quality management and quality assurance have evolved over many decades to a remarkable degree of perfection. From the times of early civilization up to the industrial Revolution, quality was the responsibility of the craftsman who made the product according to his own design, or that of his customers. With the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, when large numbers of workers were engaged to produce similar products in large quantities, quality progressively became the responsibility of the shop foreman or supervisor, who was usually selected from among experienced workers.
In the 1930s, with the beginning of manufacture of interchangeable components, inspection departments started to be introduced in firms. Their function was mainly to sort good products from bad. Inspection departments represented the separation of the quality and production functions and brought to the scene specialized inspectors and sophisticated measuring and testing equipment. In the 1940s, with the dramatic increases in production due to the war, Statistical Quality Control techniques were introduced to reduce the cost of inspection work, which had become huge with the mass production of military products.
By the end of the 1950s, Quality Control Departments existed in most manufacturing companies. Their activities usually embraced the operational techniques applied to achieve quality, including both monitoring and corrective action. In the 1970s, led by the remarkable quality revolution in Japan, the concept of Total Quality Control gained very wide acceptance.
It asserted that quality was the result of a large number of interacting activities carried out by the different departments of the organization – activities that began with the identification of the needs of the customer or consumer and continued until assessments showed these needs had been satisfied.
The different stages involved constitute what is called the “quality loop”. The concept of departmentalized quality control had, by then, evolved to a broader concept: Quality Assurance, which was defined as “all the planned and systematic actions necessary to provide confidence that a product or service satisfies quality requirements”. This evolution of quality concepts led naturally, in the 1980s, to a further broadening of the quality concept.
Today we speak of Total Quality Management which can be applied in any organization, and is perceived as “the totality of management commitment to and implementation of its own self- defined quality policy”. It includes every aspect of the overall management function of an organization. In 1979 the member of ISO and IEC for the United Kingdom, the British Standards Institution (BSI), submitted a formal proporsal to ISO that a new technical committee should be formed to prepare International Standards relating to quality assurance techniques and practices. The new technical committee was approved and given a number (ISO/TC 176), a title (Quality Assurance) a scope, and a secretariat (Canada) according to the usual ISO/IEC procedures. Twenty member countries decided to become active participants in the work (P-members) of this new committee when it was set up and another fourteen countries opted to follow the work as observers (O-members).
Today, the number of countries actively participating in ISO/TC 176 is 42 P – members and 21 O – members. There had already been a substantial base of national experience in the UK and Canada. In the UK, the BS 5750 standards were well on their way to broad acceptance and in Canada a series of national standards known as CSA Z299 were also widely used. Naturally, there were some differences in the approaches taken in the UK and Canada, and also a recognition on both sides of the Atlantic that both sets of standards could be improved. Other countries with well-developed quality management practices such as Japan were also starting to take a knee interest, so the programme of ISO/TC 176 quickly became a substantial work effort.
The first editions of the ISO 9000 standards (9000 to 9004) were completed in 1986 and published in the early part of 1987. Up to this point, one could have said that the existence of the ISO 9000 standards was not a very unsual kind of international standardization event. A new committee had been formed, it had taken about five years to produce its first major set of standards, and we would wait and see how well these standards came to be accepted.
In the 1930s, with the beginning of manufacture of interchangeable components, inspection departments started to be introduced in firms. Their function was mainly to sort good products from bad. Inspection departments represented the separation of the quality and production functions and brought to the scene specialized inspectors and sophisticated measuring and testing equipment. In the 1940s, with the dramatic increases in production due to the war, Statistical Quality Control techniques were introduced to reduce the cost of inspection work, which had become huge with the mass production of military products.
By the end of the 1950s, Quality Control Departments existed in most manufacturing companies. Their activities usually embraced the operational techniques applied to achieve quality, including both monitoring and corrective action. In the 1970s, led by the remarkable quality revolution in Japan, the concept of Total Quality Control gained very wide acceptance.
It asserted that quality was the result of a large number of interacting activities carried out by the different departments of the organization – activities that began with the identification of the needs of the customer or consumer and continued until assessments showed these needs had been satisfied.
The different stages involved constitute what is called the “quality loop”. The concept of departmentalized quality control had, by then, evolved to a broader concept: Quality Assurance, which was defined as “all the planned and systematic actions necessary to provide confidence that a product or service satisfies quality requirements”. This evolution of quality concepts led naturally, in the 1980s, to a further broadening of the quality concept.
Today we speak of Total Quality Management which can be applied in any organization, and is perceived as “the totality of management commitment to and implementation of its own self- defined quality policy”. It includes every aspect of the overall management function of an organization. In 1979 the member of ISO and IEC for the United Kingdom, the British Standards Institution (BSI), submitted a formal proporsal to ISO that a new technical committee should be formed to prepare International Standards relating to quality assurance techniques and practices. The new technical committee was approved and given a number (ISO/TC 176), a title (Quality Assurance) a scope, and a secretariat (Canada) according to the usual ISO/IEC procedures. Twenty member countries decided to become active participants in the work (P-members) of this new committee when it was set up and another fourteen countries opted to follow the work as observers (O-members).
Today, the number of countries actively participating in ISO/TC 176 is 42 P – members and 21 O – members. There had already been a substantial base of national experience in the UK and Canada. In the UK, the BS 5750 standards were well on their way to broad acceptance and in Canada a series of national standards known as CSA Z299 were also widely used. Naturally, there were some differences in the approaches taken in the UK and Canada, and also a recognition on both sides of the Atlantic that both sets of standards could be improved. Other countries with well-developed quality management practices such as Japan were also starting to take a knee interest, so the programme of ISO/TC 176 quickly became a substantial work effort.
The first editions of the ISO 9000 standards (9000 to 9004) were completed in 1986 and published in the early part of 1987. Up to this point, one could have said that the existence of the ISO 9000 standards was not a very unsual kind of international standardization event. A new committee had been formed, it had taken about five years to produce its first major set of standards, and we would wait and see how well these standards came to be accepted.
ISO 9000 – Benefits and Problems
ISO 9000 has received much publicity. Some managers see it as a prerequisite for conducting business. For others, it substitutes for the difficulties and vagaries of Total Quality Management (TQM). Some see only a needless bureaucratic boondoggle. Depending on the situation, any of these views might be correct.
Sensibly applied, ISO 9000 is a qualifier for international markets or specific domestic customers. Certification can be a valuable marketing tool. The standards are a sound blueprint for a quality system. They can lead the way to the more difficult and sophisticated approaches of Total Quality Management. ISO 9000 can improve a company’s cost structure by 5%-20%.
Approached unwisely, ISO 9000 can be costly and unproductive. It may create a quality bureaucracy which adds to the cost structure and slows product development. It can focus people on paperwork instead of customers. It can divert management concentration and energy from more vital issues.
Sensibly applied, ISO 9000 is a qualifier for international markets or specific domestic customers. Certification can be a valuable marketing tool. The standards are a sound blueprint for a quality system. They can lead the way to the more difficult and sophisticated approaches of Total Quality Management. ISO 9000 can improve a company’s cost structure by 5%-20%.
Approached unwisely, ISO 9000 can be costly and unproductive. It may create a quality bureaucracy which adds to the cost structure and slows product development. It can focus people on paperwork instead of customers. It can divert management concentration and energy from more vital issues.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)